[Ailist] AI, Competition, and Collaboration

Leif Josefsson leif.josefsson at gmail.com
Sun Nov 1 16:16:14 MST 2009


This is an interesting conversation.  Cooperation, or maybe "Co-inspiration"
in contrast to competition.

It is easy to elaborate around the theoretical ideas of Collaboration vs
Competition

But how is it in the community when it comes to action, and to the
relationships between companies and individuals?

How rooted are the metaphors of "War" in our way of thinking?  Do we dare to
share ideas, concepts etc or do we fear that someone will steal the
customer, idea, concept etc.?

If the underlying image is "war" then we think in win/lose - zero sum game
etc.
If the underlying image is "play" then the mind will think about growth,
sharing, etc

Let's say there is a network meeting.  Do I consider bringing customers
there, or am I afraid of someone else approaching them?

How do you create plans and strategies that are based on
Co-inspiration/Collaboration rather the Competition?  What are the
differences in views with an American/European/African/Asian/... other
approach?

What are the differences in the way you act, taking the ideas of AI really
seriously?

Have a good week!

/Leif

On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Bill Scott <wjs.consulting at shaw.ca> wrote:

> Hi Simon,
>
>
>
> I saw your post and it indeed is a provocative one. I'm certain I'm not
> going to stay on point and I believe others will provide you with the
> specific feedback that you are seeking.
>
>
>
> The student raises some interesting and important points and he makes the
> mistake that many do when considering generative change methods - he
> assumes
> (with apologies to Gervase Bushe) that an appreciative approach is just
> about the positive. A more thorough read of Jackie's work clearly
> demonstrates that a SOAR analysis isn't about ignoring weaknesses and
> threats, it's about reframing them so that you understand what you want to
> move toward rather than what you wish to avoid.
>
>
>
> I think the student's last remark is possibly the most telling. I think it
> points to his/her bias (and perhaps dependency?) toward traditional
> thinking/teaching. Jackie's SOAR model is receiving strong reviews from a
> variety of private sector companies, government departments, and social
> profit organizations that have used the model with great success.
>
>
>
> On a separate note, many people still view the competitive model as
> essential to optimal business practice. I'm not convinced. Numerous authors
> - including those not associated with AI - have independently concluded
> that
> collaborative practice is often (though not always) superior to competitive
> practice. One non-AI author I would direct you toward in this regard is an
> OB professor I studied with 15 years ago - Dean Tjosvold.
>
>
>
> Thanks for the opportunity to respond.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Bill Scott
>
>
>
> Surrey, B.C.
>
> bill at elpisconsulting.com <mailto:Wjs.consulting at shaw.ca>
>
> www.elpisconsulting.com
>
> 604-574-1856
>
>
>
> cid:image001.png at 01CA5A2E.BC3C8A00
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> The Appreciative Inquiry Discussion List is hosted by the David Eccles
> School of Business at the University of Utah. Jack Brittain is the list
> administrator. For subscription information, go to:
> http://mailman.business.utah.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/ailist
>



-- 
ps. Jag åker till Gotland den 20 november. Hemvändardagar.  Alla kan hitta
hem.  Följer du med? www.hemvandardagar.se

Leif Josefsson
Förenklare / Facilitator
LeanderLeander AB
Ölandsgatan 48 - 116 63 Stockholm - tel +46 70-773 00 54

www.leanderleander.com
follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/ljosefss
Send me a message: http://twitter.com/direct_messages/create/ljosefss


More information about the Ailist mailing list