[Ailist] Re: "staying positive"
Plummer, Carolyn
Carolyn.Plummer at uhn.on.ca
Thu Nov 20 06:16:04 MST 2008
I agree that the word "positive" needs clarification, as does it's
"negative" counterpart. Working in healthcare (including a background in
Oncology), I have come to know that being with people in their journey can
be a very positive experience for all parties, even if this means being with
them through times of sorrow (which could be labelled as "negative"). Joy
cannot exist without sorrow. What has worked for me has been "being with" in
a meaningful way - not judging, not trying to "direct" persons to be a
certain way (especially not directing them to be the way I want them to
be...), but rather acknowledging their experience, listening, and being
truly present with them. This can have a phenomenally positive impact.
-----Original Message-----
From: ailist-bounces at lists.business.utah.edu
[mailto:ailist-bounces at lists.business.utah.edu]On Behalf Of Howard
Ditkoff
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 11:16 PM
To: ailist at lists.business.utah.edu
Subject: [Ailist] Re: "staying positive"
Personally, I find the word "positive" very vague. What is positive? Many
malicious people feel that whatever is their agenda is positive. One of the
main things in AI that could be improved is changing the wording from
"positive" to something less manipulable.
Best,
Howard
Website: http://www.SystemsThinker.com
Blog: http://blog.SystemsThinker.com
Subscribe to SystemsThinker.com Blog
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by anyone other than the person for whom it was originally intended is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact the sender and delete all copies. Opinions, conclusions or other information contained in this e-mail may not be that of the organization.
More information about the Ailist
mailing list