[Ailist] Corporate Social Responsibility
Cyber Smtp Mexico
ronsmith at santafelearning.com
Thu Dec 18 13:14:30 MST 2008
Regarding Corporations:
I hope you have seen the interview between Bill Moyers and Andrew Bacevich
or read his book Limits of Power. I hope I can explain the connection to
this discussion. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6HLD5eDeGU
Bacevich's contention is that we are the problem in Iraq not Bush or any
other president. They are just going out to get what we the american society
want, constant flow of oil, cheap goods from china etc. We are responsible.
That is why Bacevich says Obama will not change anything, "no president can"
so perhaps he (Obama) will shift our efforts to Afghanistan but the
fundamental goal of maintaining our way of life remains unchanged.
I feel that the same is true of Corporations. The structure is actually very
beautiful. A publicly, community if you will....owned enterprize with a CEO
to run things for us the shareholders. The governing board (there are many
types) guide the CEO towards the goals set by the shareholders. (okay ....so
this is a bit polyanna-ish but structurally this is the way it works). So as
long as our stock portfolio is performing, we are happy and don't question
the Madoffs in the world nor the overpaid CEO's nor the dysfunctional
"rubber stamp" board. I am hoping we can see the positive potential for
corporations to become increasingly socially responsible but we must provide
the "push". Many are working in this direction.
I have been working 80% corporate over the last 15 years with a 1+ year
break to set up a leadership institute in a university here in Mexico. I am
now moving into the board governance arena using John Carver's model of
policy-based board governance and improving board performance through
transparency and sustainability models. I am hoping this will help
corporations reflect the broader and perhaps more sustainable interests of
their shareholders. Not just the ROI bottom line. I am working with board
members to look deeper into their own interests and desires because I
believe in the basic goodness of people.
The managers of our investments, our retirement plans etc are just pushing
(with their investment choices and rating systems) our desire to make money.
So the "they" is "us" and we are not as helpless in this area as we make
out. I feel like we are entering into a "victim" phase and my hope is we
pass through it rapidly so our "investment vehicles" can increase
transparency and sustainability as we move forward. I don't see the
corporate structure going anywhere soon because it is designed to protect
the owners (us) from liability (not responsibility) for the actions of the
enterprise.
Corporate social responsibility indexes are being established in many
countries and the ISO is working in this area as well (see iso.org and go to
ISO 26000) Wouldn't it be great if there was a comprehensive widely
accepted ISO like rating in the area of corp social responsibility (CSR)
that could be used by investors who would tell their brokers to buy only
"CSR" rated companies with a transparancy index of "X" or higher or with a
"Sustainable Practices Index" of "X" or higher.
I understand that being socially responsible doesn't prevent corporate greed
but I think it is a move in the right direction and will change the dynamic
that we have been living with for some time.
I have faith and hope that this will happen,
Ron Smith
More information about the Ailist
mailing list