[Ailist] Appreciative Valuations of Staff

[Cheri Torres]

Not to muddy the waters, but I wonder if another layer of this
valuation/evaluation process should take into account who the person is that
is being valued/evaluated combined with the purpose/intention of the action.
Again, the question about whether we should be striving for one process that
will address all people--regardless of their values, roles, life
conditions--or whether we should be developing many forms that are context
specific.

Cheri

-----Original Message-----
From: ailist-bounces at lists.business.utah.edu
[mailto:ailist-bounces at lists.business.utah.edu] On Behalf Of Bill Scott
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 8:41 PM
To: 'Roger Davies'
Cc: ailist at lists.business.utah.edu
Subject: RE: [Ailist] Appreciative Valuations of Staff

Hi Roger,

I sure wish I'd seen your response before writing my own. I could have just
said, "Ditto." to your succinct and eloquently phrased response.

Your statement that, "For me the question is not so much about which
evaluation process is used but more about how and what it is used for. The
true opportunities lay at least one layer below the method," resonates very
well for me indeed. 

Regards,
Bill




No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG. 
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.5/1401 - Release Date: 4/28/2008
7:18 AM
 

_______________________________________________
The Appreciative Inquiry Discussion List is hosted by the David Eccles
School of Business at the University of Utah. Jack Brittain is the list
administrator. For subscription information, go to:
http://mailman.business.utah.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/ailist